EIP 1102: Opt-in account exposure
Author | Paul Bouchon |
---|---|
Discussions-To | https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-1102-opt-in-provider-access/414 |
Status | Draft |
Type | Standards Track |
Category | Interface |
Created | 2018-05-04 |
Requires | 1474 |
Simple summary
This proposal describes a communication protocol between dapps and Ethereum-enabled DOM environments that allows the Ethereum-enabled DOM environment to choose what information to supply the dapp with and when.
Abstract
The previous generation of Ethereum-enabled DOM environments follows a pattern of injecting a provider populated with accounts without user consent. This puts users of such environments at risk because malicious websites can use these accounts to view detailed account information and to arbitrarily initiate unwanted transactions on a user’s behalf.
This proposal outlines a protocol in which Ethereum-enabled DOM environments can choose to expose no accounts until the user approves account access.
Specification
Concepts
RFC-2119
The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119.
eth_requestAccounts
Providers exposed by Ethereum-enabled DOM environments define a new RPC method: eth_requestAccounts
. Calling this method may trigger a user interface that allows the user to approve or reject account access for a given dapp. This method returns a Promise
that is resolved with an Array
of accounts or is rejected with an Error
if accounts are not available.
ethereum.send('eth_requestAccounts'): Promise<string>
Provider#enable (DEPRECATED)
Note: This method is deprecated in favor of the RPC method eth_requestAccounts
.
Providers exposed by Ethereum-enabled DOM environments define a new RPC method: ethereum.enable()
. Calling this method triggers a user interface that allows the user to approve or reject account access for a given dapp. This method returns a Promise
that is resolved with an Array
of accounts if the user approves access or rejected with an Error
if the user rejects access.
ethereum.enable(): Promise<any>
Protocol
Legacy dapp initialization
START dapp
IF web3 is defined
CONTINUE dapp
IF web3 is undefined
STOP dapp
Proposed dapp initialization
START dapp
IF provider is defined
REQUEST[1] account access
IF user approves
RESOLVE[2] account access
CONTINUE dapp
IF user rejects
REJECT[3] account access
STOP dapp
IF provider is undefined
STOP dapp
[1] REQUEST
Dapps MUST request accounts by calling the eth_requestAccounts
RPC method on the provider exposed at window.ethereum
. Calling this method MAY trigger a user interface that allows the user to approve or reject account access for a given dapp. This method MUST return a Promise
that is resolved with an array of one or more user accounts or rejected if no accounts are available (e.g., the user rejected account access).
[2] RESOLVE
The Promise
returned when calling the eth_requestAccounts
RPC method MUST be resolved with an Array
of user accounts.
[3] REJECT
The Promise
returned when calling the eth_requestAccounts
RPC method MUST be rejected with an informative Error
if no accounts are available for any reason.
Example initialization
try {
// Request account access if needed
const accounts = await ethereum.send('eth_requestAccounts');
// Accounts now exposed, use them
ethereum.send('eth_sendTransaction', { from: accounts[0], /* ... */ })
} catch (error) {
// User denied account access
}
Constraints
- Browsers MUST expose a provider at
window.ethereum
. - Browsers MUST define an
eth_requestAccounts
RPC method. - Browsers MAY wait for a user interaction before resolving/rejecting the
eth_requestAccounts
promise. - Browsers MUST include at least one account if the
eth_requestAccounts
promise is resolved. - Browsers MUST reject the promise with an informative error if no accounts are available.
Rationale
The pattern of automatic account exposure followed by the previous generation of Ethereum-enabled DOM environments fails to protect user privacy and fails to maintain safe user experience: untrusted websites can both view detailed account information and arbitrarily initiate transactions on a user’s behalf. Even though most users may reject unsolicited transactions on untrusted websites, a protocol for account access should make such unsolicited requests impossible.
This proposal establishes a new pattern wherein dapps must request access to user accounts. This protocol directly strengthens user privacy by allowing the browser to hide user accounts and preventing unsolicited transaction requests on untrusted sites.
Immediate value-add
- Users can reject account access on untrusted sites to hide accounts.
- Users can reject account access on untrusted sites to prevent unsolicited transactions.
Long-term value-add
- Dapps could request specific account information based on user consent.
- Dapps could request specific user information based on user consent (uPort, DIDs).
- Dapps could request a specific network based on user consent.
- Dapps could request multiple instances of the above based on user consent.
Backwards compatibility
This proposal impacts dapp developers and requires that they request access to user accounts following the protocol outlined above. Similarly, this proposal impacts dapp browser developers and requires that they only expose user accounts following the protocol defined above.
Implementation
The MetaMask team has implemented the strategy described above.
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.